Difference between revisions of "Eadric Streona"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(categorising)
(links, fix category)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Much of what is known about '''Eadric''' comes from the ''[[Anglo-Saxon Chronicle]]'', whose editors do not seem to have liked him. However, he does seem to have had an unfortunate talent for choosing the winning side in conflicts, usually while the conflict was going on.
 
Much of what is known about '''Eadric''' comes from the ''[[Anglo-Saxon Chronicle]]'', whose editors do not seem to have liked him. However, he does seem to have had an unfortunate talent for choosing the winning side in conflicts, usually while the conflict was going on.
   
Born of ignoble stock, he made himself useful to King [[Aethelred Unraed|Ethelred]] II, and was made [[ealdorman]] of the Mercians in 1007, and given Ethelred's daughter, Eadgyth, in marriage. The next year, when Ethelred tried to raise a fleet to defend against Viking attacks, Eadric is said to have advised against this, and then to have raised feuds amongst his family which distracted the king. The implication drawn by the Chroniclers was that, in this, Eadric was complicit with the raiders. The fleet (possibly storm damaged) failed to stop an invasion in 1009, and Ethelred only got rid of the raiders by paying tribute of around
+
Born of ignoble stock, he made himself useful to [[King]] [[Aethelred Unraed|Ethelred]] II, and was made [[ealdorman]] of the [[Mercia]]ns in 1007, and given Ethelred's daughter, Eadgyth, in [[marriage]]. The next year, when Ethelred tried to raise a [[navy|fleet]] to defend against [[Viking]] attacks, Eadric is said to have advised against this, and then to have raised feuds amongst his family which distracted the king. The implication drawn by the Chroniclers was that, in this, Eadric was complicit with the raiders. The fleet (possibly storm damaged) failed to stop an invasion in 1009, and Ethelred only got rid of the raiders by paying [[tribute]] of around �48,000.
   
In 1015, [[Canute the Great|Cnut]] sailed for England. [[Aethelred Unraed|Ethelred]] <!-- son, (do you mean his son or was this a stray error?) --> summoned a great council of nobles in Oxford. Eadric promptly murdered two of them, Siferth and Morcar, for reasons unstated. Ethelred seized their property and arrested Siferth's widow, Ealdgyth. His son [[Edmund Ironside]], for reasons he saw good, promptly took the lady out of custody, married her, rode to Siferth's lands and, with the consent of the people there, took over Siferth's [[demesne]].
+
In 1015, [[Canute the Great|Cnut]] sailed for [[England]]. [[Aethelred Unraed|Ethelred]] <!-- son, (do you mean his son or was this a stray error?) --> summoned a great council of [[noble]]s in [[Oxford]]. Eadric promptly murdered two of them, Siferth and Morcar, for reasons unstated. Ethelred seized their property and arrested Siferth's widow, Ealdgyth. His son [[Edmund Ironside]], for reasons he saw good, promptly took the lady out of custody, married her, rode to Siferth's lands and, with the consent of the people there, took over Siferth's [[demesne]].
   
Cnut landed, and Eadric, with 40 ships, deserted the king, and went over to him. As Cnut turned south, towards London, after ravaging Northumbria and killing its earl, Ethelred died and [[Edmund Ironside|Edmund]] his son was chosen as king. Cnut besieged London, but Edmund broke out, harried Cnut's forces, forcing him to break the siege, and caught him at Otford in Kent, doing bloody slaughter. At this point Eadric swapped sides again and joined Edmund. Who, for reasons unguessable, accepted him, with the foreseeable consequence.
+
Cnut landed, and Eadric, with 40 [[ship]]s, deserted the king, and went over to him. As Cnut turned south, towards [[London]], after ravaging [[Northumbria]] and killing its [[earl]], Ethelred died and [[Edmund Ironside|Edmund]] his son was chosen as king. Cnut besieged London, but Edmund broke out, harried Cnut's forces, forcing him to break the [[siege]], and caught him at Otford in Kent, doing bloody slaughter. At this point Eadric swapped sides again and joined Edmund. Who, for reasons unguessable, accepted him, with the foreseeable consequence.
   
In battle at Ashingdon, Eadric went back over to Cnut, and Edmund was defeated, fleeing to Gloucestershire. The two agreed to split the kingdom, which lasted until Edmund died (or was murdered, possibly by Eadric) in November 1016.
+
In battle at Ashingdon, Eadric went back over to Cnut, and Edmund was defeated, fleeing to Gloucestershire. The two agreed to split the [[kingdom]], which lasted until Edmund died (or was murdered, possibly by Eadric) in November 1016.
   
Left as sole king, [[Canute the Great|Cnut]] gave Eadric the earldom of Mercia. Then he had second thoughts, and (according to the Chroniclers) asked Eadric how he could be sure, given his past history of betrayals, that he would remain loyal this time. To ensure his loyalty Cnut had Eadric executed. Eadgyth Cnut gave to another earl, Thorkell of East Anglia, even while he himself was marrying Ethelred's widow, Aelgifu. <br>
+
Left as sole king, [[Canute the Great|Cnut]] gave Eadric the earldom of Mercia. Then he had second thoughts, and (according to the Chroniclers) asked Eadric how he could be sure, given his past history of betrayals, that he would remain loyal this time. To ensure his loyalty Cnut had Eadric [[execution|executed]]. Eadgyth Cnut gave to another earl, Thorkell of East [[Anglia]], even while he himself was marrying Ethelred's widow, Aelgifu.
   
A play ''Edmond Ironside'', written in the [[Elizabethan]] style, portrays Eadric as a villain of [[Richard III|Ricardian]] hue, making him hate [[Edmund Ironside|Edmund]] for reminding Eadric of his base birth, whilst [[Canute the Great|Cnut]] valued him heedless of his origins. It also features an incident in which Eadric produces what he says is Edmund's head in order to induce his troops to surrender. The play has sometimes been ascribed to [[Shakespeare]], but the attribution is widely challenged, not least on the grounds that the play is rambling and poorly organised. Eadric as a character is, however, acknowledged as a prototypical Elizabethan villain.
+
A [[play]] ''Edmond Ironside'', written in the [[Elizabethan]] style, portrays Eadric as a villain of [[Richard III|Ricardian]] hue, making him hate [[Edmund Ironside|Edmund]] for reminding Eadric of his base birth, whilst [[Canute the Great|Cnut]] valued him heedless of his origins. It also features an incident in which Eadric produces what he says is Edmund's head in order to induce his troops to surrender. The play has sometimes been ascribed to [[Shakespeare]], but the attribution is widely challenged, not least on the grounds that the play is rambling and poorly organised. Eadric as a character is, however, acknowledged as a prototypical Elizabethan villain.
   
In December 2005 the BBC History Magazine[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4560716.stm] named Eadric Streona the worst Briton of the eleventh century.
+
In December [[2005]] the [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4560716.stm BBC History Magazine] named Eadric Streona the worst Briton of the [[11th century|eleventh century]].
  +
[[category:people (medieval)]][[category:10th century)]][[category:11th century]]
+
[[category:people (medieval)]][[category:10th century]][[category:11th century]]

Revision as of 16:29, 31 August 2006

Much of what is known about Eadric comes from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, whose editors do not seem to have liked him. However, he does seem to have had an unfortunate talent for choosing the winning side in conflicts, usually while the conflict was going on.

Born of ignoble stock, he made himself useful to King Ethelred II, and was made ealdorman of the Mercians in 1007, and given Ethelred's daughter, Eadgyth, in marriage. The next year, when Ethelred tried to raise a fleet to defend against Viking attacks, Eadric is said to have advised against this, and then to have raised feuds amongst his family which distracted the king. The implication drawn by the Chroniclers was that, in this, Eadric was complicit with the raiders. The fleet (possibly storm damaged) failed to stop an invasion in 1009, and Ethelred only got rid of the raiders by paying tribute of around �48,000.

In 1015, Cnut sailed for England. Ethelred summoned a great council of nobles in Oxford. Eadric promptly murdered two of them, Siferth and Morcar, for reasons unstated. Ethelred seized their property and arrested Siferth's widow, Ealdgyth. His son Edmund Ironside, for reasons he saw good, promptly took the lady out of custody, married her, rode to Siferth's lands and, with the consent of the people there, took over Siferth's demesne.

Cnut landed, and Eadric, with 40 ships, deserted the king, and went over to him. As Cnut turned south, towards London, after ravaging Northumbria and killing its earl, Ethelred died and Edmund his son was chosen as king. Cnut besieged London, but Edmund broke out, harried Cnut's forces, forcing him to break the siege, and caught him at Otford in Kent, doing bloody slaughter. At this point Eadric swapped sides again and joined Edmund. Who, for reasons unguessable, accepted him, with the foreseeable consequence.

In battle at Ashingdon, Eadric went back over to Cnut, and Edmund was defeated, fleeing to Gloucestershire. The two agreed to split the kingdom, which lasted until Edmund died (or was murdered, possibly by Eadric) in November 1016.

Left as sole king, Cnut gave Eadric the earldom of Mercia. Then he had second thoughts, and (according to the Chroniclers) asked Eadric how he could be sure, given his past history of betrayals, that he would remain loyal this time. To ensure his loyalty Cnut had Eadric executed. Eadgyth Cnut gave to another earl, Thorkell of East Anglia, even while he himself was marrying Ethelred's widow, Aelgifu.

A play Edmond Ironside, written in the Elizabethan style, portrays Eadric as a villain of Ricardian hue, making him hate Edmund for reminding Eadric of his base birth, whilst Cnut valued him heedless of his origins. It also features an incident in which Eadric produces what he says is Edmund's head in order to induce his troops to surrender. The play has sometimes been ascribed to Shakespeare, but the attribution is widely challenged, not least on the grounds that the play is rambling and poorly organised. Eadric as a character is, however, acknowledged as a prototypical Elizabethan villain.

In December 2005 the BBC History Magazine named Eadric Streona the worst Briton of the eleventh century.