Forest: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(links, formatting) |
(categorising) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The word was derived from Medieval [[Latin]] |
The word was derived from Medieval [[Latin]] |
||
''foresta'', itself from Classical Latin |
''foresta'', itself from Classical Latin |
||
''foris'' meaning "outside" -- land, not |
''foris'' meaning "outside" -- land, not necessarily wooded, |
||
which lay beyond the boundaries of [[manor]]s and |
which lay beyond the boundaries of [[manor]]s and |
||
settlement. Mostly forest was wooded, but as a |
settlement. Mostly forest was wooded, but as a |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
As a definitional term its main thrust was that forest |
As a definitional term its main thrust was that forest |
||
land was subject to [[forest law]]. |
land was subject to [[forest law|Forest Law]]. |
||
[[category:plants]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:18, 27 May 2006
Although the Anglo-Saxon kings had game preserves amongst the English woodland, it was not until William I, and the Domesday Book that the word forest entered the language.
The word was derived from Medieval Latin foresta, itself from Classical Latin foris meaning "outside" -- land, not necessarily wooded, which lay beyond the boundaries of manors and settlement. Mostly forest was wooded, but as a term it could also include pasture, woodland and even land under agriculture.
As a definitional term its main thrust was that forest land was subject to Forest Law.
