Proof: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(not sure what categories are applicable? combat? armour? SCAism?)
 
m (category, bulletproof info)
Line 1: Line 1:
In some [[recreation group]]s, the [[combat]] [[laws|rules]] specify that certain pieces of [[armour]] are not vulnerable to certain [[weapon]]s. For instance, in the [[SCA]], [[plate armour]] is sometimes treated as [[arrow]]-'''proof''', so a [[fighter]] wearing such armour is not "[[kill]]ed" or "injured" if the armour is hit by an arrow. However, other weapons (e.g. [[sword]]s, [[cannonball]]s) are still effective. Depending on the group, these rules may be the norm, [[custom|customary]] or one-offs for that particular [[war]].
In some [[recreation group]]s, the [[combat]] [[laws|rules]] specify that certain pieces of [[armour]] are not vulnerable to certain [[weapon]]s. For instance, in the [[SCA]], [[plate armour]] is sometimes treated as [[arrow]]-'''proof''', so a [[fighter]] wearing such armour is not "[[kill]]ed" or "injured" if the armour is hit by an arrow. However, other weapons (e.g. [[sword]]s, [[cannonball]]s) are still effective. Depending on the group, these rules may be the norm, [[custom|customary]] or one-offs for that particular [[war]].

Late-[[period]] and [[rennaisance]] armour was sometimes "proof" against [[firearm|pistol-balls]]. This was achieved by firing a pistol at the armour at close range which left a deep dent, but did not penetrate. Such "bullet-proofed" armour was highly prized.

[[category:armour]] [[category:SCAism]]

Revision as of 13:31, 4 May 2006

In some recreation groups, the combat rules specify that certain pieces of armour are not vulnerable to certain weapons. For instance, in the SCA, plate armour is sometimes treated as arrow-proof, so a fighter wearing such armour is not "killed" or "injured" if the armour is hit by an arrow. However, other weapons (e.g. swords, cannonballs) are still effective. Depending on the group, these rules may be the norm, customary or one-offs for that particular war.

Late-period and rennaisance armour was sometimes "proof" against pistol-balls. This was achieved by firing a pistol at the armour at close range which left a deep dent, but did not penetrate. Such "bullet-proofed" armour was highly prized.