Dark Ages: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Reverted edits by Cunnan (Talk); changed back to last version by Paul Matisz) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Origins of the Term== |
==Origins of the Term== |
||
It probably originates from [[Britain|British]] historians, who had no idea of what if anything existed between the withdrawals of the Legions and the |
It probably originates from [[Britain|British]] historians, who had no idea of what if anything existed between the withdrawals of the Legions, and the rationalisation of the [[Anglo-Saxon]] influx into nominate "[[kingdom]]s". They had heard rumours of [[King Arthur]] but lacking documentary proof he existed, they dismissed him. They had [[ecclesiastical]] works, most of which they dismissed as [[hagiography]], collected [[pagan]] [[mythology|legend]] (all, of course, untrue) and milleniallist rantings. They had occasional chronicles, which were unsupported by "hard evidence" (such as earlier academics' learned disquisitions, or undemolished buildings). |
||
They therefore constructed the "Dark Ages" as a period where Nothing Of Significance Happened, and people simply worked all day long and sat around in the dark at night, waiting for the glorious sunrise of academia, which was taken, pretty much, to commence with King [[Alfred the Great|Alfred]], who as well as burning drop scones, set up (or tried to) a [[library]]. |
They therefore constructed the "Dark Ages" as a period where Nothing Of Significance Happened, and people simply worked all day long and sat around in the dark at night, waiting for the glorious sunrise of academia, which was taken, pretty much, to commence with King [[Alfred the Great|Alfred]], who as well as burning drop scones, set up (or tried to) a [[library]]. ([[Canute_the_Great|Cnut]] obviously didn't count -- he did silly things with thrones and tides and anyway, he was Norse.) The historians' definition of Full Daylight probably coincided with [[Edward the Confessor]], since they knew he was supposed to have been a learned man, and since they needed to discuss whether [[Harold Godwinson ]] had or had not sworn holy oaths to [[William the Bastard]] prior to his (Harold's) seizure of the [[throne]] on Edward's death, and therefore whether William was a bloody invader, or simply a man coming to claim his rightful realm. (Since [[Hardrada]] died, he was damned as an invader either way.) |
||
The term '''Dark Ages''' has fallen out of general use by scholars of the [[medieval]] period. |
The term '''Dark Ages''' has fallen out of general use by scholars of the [[medieval]] period. |
||
There is a Dark Age in [[Ancient Greece|Ancient Greek]] history, between the [[Helladic]] and the [[Hellenistic]] periods. For the layman, this is the time between the great [[Bronze Age]] civilizations of [[Mycenae]], [[Troy]] and [[Crete]] (which likely were the source of the [[Odyssey]]-cycle, as popular in the medieval period as today) and the classical [[Iron Age]] Hellenes of [[Athens]], [[Sparta]], et al |
There is a Dark Age in [[Ancient Greece|Ancient Greek]] history, between the [[Helladic]] and the [[Hellenistic]] periods. For the layman, this is the time between the great [[Bronze Age]] civilizations of [[Mycenae]], [[Troy]] and [[Crete]] (which likely were the source of the [[Odyssey]]-cycle, as popular in the medieval period as today) and the classical [[Iron Age]] Hellenes of [[Athens]], [[Sparta]], et al. |
||
[[category:periods]] |
[[category:periods]] |
||
Revision as of 10:56, 7 August 2009
The Dark Ages is the term used for a period of early medieval history between the Roman Era and the origins of the current European nation states. The term early medieval is now often used in its place. Opinions differ but this period is sometimes given as between 400CE and 1000CE.
Origins of the Term
It probably originates from British historians, who had no idea of what if anything existed between the withdrawals of the Legions, and the rationalisation of the Anglo-Saxon influx into nominate "kingdoms". They had heard rumours of King Arthur but lacking documentary proof he existed, they dismissed him. They had ecclesiastical works, most of which they dismissed as hagiography, collected pagan legend (all, of course, untrue) and milleniallist rantings. They had occasional chronicles, which were unsupported by "hard evidence" (such as earlier academics' learned disquisitions, or undemolished buildings).
They therefore constructed the "Dark Ages" as a period where Nothing Of Significance Happened, and people simply worked all day long and sat around in the dark at night, waiting for the glorious sunrise of academia, which was taken, pretty much, to commence with King Alfred, who as well as burning drop scones, set up (or tried to) a library. (Cnut obviously didn't count -- he did silly things with thrones and tides and anyway, he was Norse.) The historians' definition of Full Daylight probably coincided with Edward the Confessor, since they knew he was supposed to have been a learned man, and since they needed to discuss whether Harold Godwinson had or had not sworn holy oaths to William the Bastard prior to his (Harold's) seizure of the throne on Edward's death, and therefore whether William was a bloody invader, or simply a man coming to claim his rightful realm. (Since Hardrada died, he was damned as an invader either way.)
The term Dark Ages has fallen out of general use by scholars of the medieval period.
There is a Dark Age in Ancient Greek history, between the Helladic and the Hellenistic periods. For the layman, this is the time between the great Bronze Age civilizations of Mycenae, Troy and Crete (which likely were the source of the Odyssey-cycle, as popular in the medieval period as today) and the classical Iron Age Hellenes of Athens, Sparta, et al.
