Order of Precedence: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (clarification of explanation) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* non-armigerous awards |
* non-armigerous awards |
||
Note that if |
Note that if person A had received a [[laurel]] and a [[pelican]] in the last year, an person B had received a [[laurel]] three years ago, person B would be ranked higher, having reached peerage level first. The fact that someone has obtained a second award at a certain level does not add to their precedence. |
||
The Lochac Order of Precedence can be located at: http://www.sca.org.au/herald/php/OP.php |
The Lochac Order of Precedence can be located at: http://www.sca.org.au/herald/php/OP.php |
||
Revision as of 23:18, 26 October 2003
The order of Precedence is a listing of all the people who have received awards within the SCA, ordered from the highest ranking to the lowest. Ranking (or precedence) is determined by the highest level of award received, and the date an award of that level was first given to the recipient. The earlier a person received an award, the higher they appear on the order of precedence.
The ranking of awards, from highest to lowest, are:
- Duke and Duchess
- Count and Countess
- Viscount and Viscountess
- Other peers
- Grant of Arms
- leaf level awards
- Award of Arms
- non-armigerous awards
Note that if person A had received a laurel and a pelican in the last year, an person B had received a laurel three years ago, person B would be ranked higher, having reached peerage level first. The fact that someone has obtained a second award at a certain level does not add to their precedence.
The Lochac Order of Precedence can be located at: http://www.sca.org.au/herald/php/OP.php
