InterKingdom Anthropology: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
*The use of the term "[[Master at Arms]]" rather than "Master of Arms", and also whether the Master of Arms is referred to as "Master" or "Sir".
*The use of the term "[[Master at Arms]]" rather than "Master of Arms", and also whether the Master of Arms is referred to as "Master" or "Sir".
*The use of a particular [[vivat|cheer]] or acclamation.
*The use of a particular [[vivat|cheer]] or acclamation.
*The use of coloured [[belt]]s (other than a [[white belt]]) to denote one's status as a [[Squire]], [[Apprentice]] or [[Protege]].


[[Category: SCAism]]
[[Category: SCAism]]

Revision as of 03:15, 11 July 2008

InterKingdom Anthropology (IKA) is a term au courant on the usenet group rec.org.sca (sometimes called the Rialto) as well as other electronic forums. It refers somewhat lightheartedly to the study of regional and kingdom differences in the SCA. Often it is used in the form of a disclaimer as in

"This may be an exercise in InterKingdom Anthropology, but locally ..."

The other usage is the flip side of the first, and IKA is invoked when someone has referred to local custom as universal truth, as in

"I'm afraid that this is IKA, since <your example> does not apply <in some other locality.>"

Examples of IKA