Talk:Appleholm: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Yes, the emblazon appears to be wrong. The blazon lists the chief as embattled, I'll find a better picture at some point unless someone else does. [[User:AlexandreDavigne|AlexandreDavigne]] 03:30, 4 November 2006 (EST)
Yes, the emblazon appears to be wrong. The blazon lists the chief as embattled, I'll find a better picture at some point unless someone else does. [[User:AlexandreDavigne|AlexandreDavigne]] 03:30, 4 November 2006 (EST)


What, no discussion of "Verminy" in the heraldry? Or was that an urban myth? :) --[[User:Sabine|Sabine]] 05:46, 4 November 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 04:46, 4 November 2006

Yes, the emblazon appears to be wrong. The blazon lists the chief as embattled, I'll find a better picture at some point unless someone else does. AlexandreDavigne 03:30, 4 November 2006 (EST)


What, no discussion of "Verminy" in the heraldry? Or was that an urban myth? :) --Sabine 05:46, 4 November 2006 (EST)