Category talk:Recipes: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(unredacted recipes) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think we should add the sub-category [[:Category:Unredacted recipes]] to keep this list a bit tidier (I'm assuming most people don't want to see the unredacted recipes). - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] 10:34, 24 Aug 2004 (EST) |
I think we should add the sub-category [[:Category:Unredacted recipes]] to keep this list a bit tidier (I'm assuming most people don't want to see the unredacted recipes). - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] 10:34, 24 Aug 2004 (EST) |
||
* There is a list of supposedly unredacted recipes on [[Cunnan:Recipes from the Forme of Cury]]. That what I was using the other day to work out which articles didn't have [[:category:recipes]]. I was nowhere near finished on that. Do we really want to shift all of them to a unredacted category? I suspect that people won't remember to shift them into the top category once they have been redacted, making it harder for us who edit stuff like that. I would think that it would be best to just have a category for recipes and one for Forme of Cury. The same article can appear in both. If you can't understand the period recipe, then tough luck! I can't see how a different category is going to change that. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] |
* There is a list of supposedly unredacted recipes on [[Cunnan:Recipes from the Forme of Cury]]. That what I was using the other day to work out which articles didn't have [[:category:recipes]]. I was nowhere near finished on that. Do we really want to shift all of them to a unredacted category? I suspect that people won't remember to shift them into the top category once they have been redacted, making it harder for us who edit stuff like that. I would think that it would be best to just have a category for recipes and one for Forme of Cury. The same article can appear in both. If you can't understand the period recipe, then tough luck! I can't see how a different category is going to change that. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] |
||
** The list at [[Cunnan:Recipes from the Forme of Cury]] isn't automatically updated whereas [[:Category:Unredacted recipes]] would be. As it stands someone would need to edit a recipe article '''and''' [[Cunnan:Recipes from the Forme of Cury]] to alter the list. Much easier to ask them to remember to change [[:Category:Unredacted recipes]] to [[:Category:Recipes]]. Another possibility would be putting both [[:Category:Unredacted recipes]] and [[:Category:Recipes]] into the articles and removing [[:Category:Unredacted recipes]] once a redaction is submitted. We'd get all recipes in the recipes category and still have an automatically updated list of unredacted recipes. - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] 14:24, 4 Sep 2004 (EST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 4 September 2004
I think we should add the sub-category Category:Unredacted recipes to keep this list a bit tidier (I'm assuming most people don't want to see the unredacted recipes). - Tobin 10:34, 24 Aug 2004 (EST)
- There is a list of supposedly unredacted recipes on Cunnan:Recipes from the Forme of Cury. That what I was using the other day to work out which articles didn't have category:recipes. I was nowhere near finished on that. Do we really want to shift all of them to a unredacted category? I suspect that people won't remember to shift them into the top category once they have been redacted, making it harder for us who edit stuff like that. I would think that it would be best to just have a category for recipes and one for Forme of Cury. The same article can appear in both. If you can't understand the period recipe, then tough luck! I can't see how a different category is going to change that. - Cian Gillebhrath
- The list at Cunnan:Recipes from the Forme of Cury isn't automatically updated whereas Category:Unredacted recipes would be. As it stands someone would need to edit a recipe article and Cunnan:Recipes from the Forme of Cury to alter the list. Much easier to ask them to remember to change Category:Unredacted recipes to Category:Recipes. Another possibility would be putting both Category:Unredacted recipes and Category:Recipes into the articles and removing Category:Unredacted recipes once a redaction is submitted. We'd get all recipes in the recipes category and still have an automatically updated list of unredacted recipes. - Tobin 14:24, 4 Sep 2004 (EST)
