Difference between revisions of "Baronet"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(early usage, needs an explanation of "individual summons")
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A '''Baronet''' is ''not'' a [[baron]] or a [[baroness]] or the lands they hold. Instead it is a slightly lower [[England|British]] [[rank]] that lies between baron and [[knight]] on the [[Order of Precedence]]. Only the [[Knights of the Garter]] are above it. It is the lowest [[hereditary]] [[order]].
 
A '''Baronet''' is ''not'' a [[baron]] or a [[baroness]] or the lands they hold. Instead it is a slightly lower [[England|British]] [[rank]] that lies between baron and [[knight]] on the [[Order of Precedence]]. Only the [[Knights of the Garter]] are above it. It is the lowest [[hereditary]] [[order]].
   
This sense of baronet is also just outside of the [[SCA]] [[period]] as it was started by [[James I]] in 1611. However, the term was also used by [[Richard II]] to refer to [[nobility]] who lost the right of individual summons to [[Parliament]].
+
This sense of baronet is also just outside of the [[SCA]] [[period]] as it was started by [[James I]] in 1611, as a quick way of raising income -- you paid, he made. However, the term was also used by [[Richard II]] to refer to [[nobility]] who lost the right of individual summons to [[Parliament]].
   
 
===References===
 
===References===

Revision as of 02:03, 11 March 2005

A Baronet is not a baron or a baroness or the lands they hold. Instead it is a slightly lower British rank that lies between baron and knight on the Order of Precedence. Only the Knights of the Garter are above it. It is the lowest hereditary order.

This sense of baronet is also just outside of the SCA period as it was started by James I in 1611, as a quick way of raising income -- you paid, he made. However, the term was also used by Richard II to refer to nobility who lost the right of individual summons to Parliament.

References