Talk:Master at Arms: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(SCA terminology) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So is it [[Master at Arms]] or [[Master of Arms]]? Or both? What does the [[SCA]] [[corpora]] and the [[heraldic]] [[laws]] say? - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 14:47, 8 Jun 2006 (EST) |
So is it [[Master at Arms]] or [[Master of Arms]]? Or both? What does the [[SCA]] [[corpora]] and the [[heraldic]] [[laws]] say? - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 14:47, 8 Jun 2006 (EST) |
||
Also, I was under the impression that Masters at Arms are not actually part of the [[Order of Chivalry]] and therefore not considered [[knight]]s. Is this so? - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 13:01, 30 August 2006 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 14:01, 30 August 2006
So is it Master at Arms or Master of Arms? Or both? What does the SCA corpora and the heraldic laws say? - Cian Gillebhrath 14:47, 8 Jun 2006 (EST)
Also, I was under the impression that Masters at Arms are not actually part of the Order of Chivalry and therefore not considered knights. Is this so? - Cian Gillebhrath 13:01, 30 August 2006 (EST)
