Category talk:Device heraldry: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (struck out my erroneous belief) |
(two-timing entries in subcategories) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*<strike>As far as I know fimbriated only applies to ordinaries.</strike> Fimbriation applies to simple charges only (including any ordinary). Your basic description is correct though. As well as fimbriated we need [[cotised]]. As for mulletty, it may be just as well to create a redirect to [[mullet]] and add the information there. Thanks for the heads up. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 01:07, 10 Aug 2005 (CDT) |
*<strike>As far as I know fimbriated only applies to ordinaries.</strike> Fimbriation applies to simple charges only (including any ordinary). Your basic description is correct though. As well as fimbriated we need [[cotised]]. As for mulletty, it may be just as well to create a redirect to [[mullet]] and add the information there. Thanks for the heads up. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 01:07, 10 Aug 2005 (CDT) |
||
---- |
|||
Should all entries in [[:category:heraldic poses]] also be in [[:category:device heraldry]]? cf. [[Couchant]]. I would say no. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 01:51, 17 Oct 2005 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 17:51, 17 October 2005
Two more wiki pages needed "fimbriated" and "mulletty". From recent Lochac discussions, fimbriated seems to indicate that a charge, division or ordinary is surrounded by a border of a certain tincture. Mulletty seems to say the division or ordinary is filled with mullets. Can someone who is more in the know complete these pages and link to them on appropriate pages (cf. Kingdom of the East's device). - Cian Gillebhrath 20:34, 9 Aug 2005 (CDT)
As far as I know fimbriated only applies to ordinaries.Fimbriation applies to simple charges only (including any ordinary). Your basic description is correct though. As well as fimbriated we need cotised. As for mulletty, it may be just as well to create a redirect to mullet and add the information there. Thanks for the heads up. Conrad Leviston 01:07, 10 Aug 2005 (CDT)
Should all entries in category:heraldic poses also be in category:device heraldry? cf. Couchant. I would say no. - Cian Gillebhrath 01:51, 17 Oct 2005 (CDT)
