Custom: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Preliminary) |
(Added "time immemorial") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
To be a source of law, a '''custom''' had to meet certain criteria. <br> |
To be a source of law, a local '''custom''' had to meet certain criteria. <br> |
||
It had to be |
It had to be |
||
* clear, certain, and consistent |
* clear, certain, and consistent |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* in conformity with any applicable [[statute]]s (otherwise these overrode the custom) |
* in conformity with any applicable [[statute]]s (otherwise these overrode the custom) |
||
* continuously held since "time immemorial" |
* continuously held since "time immemorial" |
||
'''Time immemorial''', ''per se'', meant a time antedating any legal history. However, for clarity, this was taken by reference to a particular voyage of the [[King]] of [[England]] to [[France]]. In 1275/6, again to avoid compication, this was finally fixed to have been at the beginning of the reign of [[Richard I]] in 1189. <br> |
|||
This had the additional effect that a claimed custom could thereafter be defeated simply by showing that its exercise would hve been impossible at that time -- for example a claimed customary right of grazing on land which, on enquiry, proved to have been underwater at or since 1189. |
Revision as of 00:42, 13 October 2004
To be a source of law, a local custom had to meet certain criteria.
It had to be
- clear, certain, and consistent
- reasonable
- obligatory and exercised as of right
- geographically local
- in conformity with any applicable statutes (otherwise these overrode the custom)
- continuously held since "time immemorial"
Time immemorial, per se, meant a time antedating any legal history. However, for clarity, this was taken by reference to a particular voyage of the King of England to France. In 1275/6, again to avoid compication, this was finally fixed to have been at the beginning of the reign of Richard I in 1189.
This had the additional effect that a claimed custom could thereafter be defeated simply by showing that its exercise would hve been impossible at that time -- for example a claimed customary right of grazing on land which, on enquiry, proved to have been underwater at or since 1189.