Asia: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(typos, wiki, clarifying documentation )
Line 1: Line 1:
During [[period]], [[Europe]] had only limited contact and [[trade]] with '''Asia''' and there are, relatively, few people with Asian [[persona]]e in the [[SCA]]. Although just because there was less contact with Asia in period, does not mean this should discourage you from exlporing asian personas!
During [[period]], [[Europe]] had only limited contact and [[trade]] with '''Asia''' and there are, relatively, few people with Asian [[persona]]s in the [[SCA]]. Although there was minimal contact between Europe and Asia during period, this does not mean that Asian personas are forbidden.


Some people may have issues with Japanese personas, because there are only twelve documented people from [[Japan]] in period. You could also argue that there should not be a problem with Japanese personas because there ''is documentation of the Japanese being in Europe at that time''. It may be minimal documentation, but it is documentation nonetheless!
Some people may take issue with Japanese personas, because there are only twelve documented instances of people from [[Japan]] visiting Europe in period. Conversely, it can also be argued that there should not be a problem with Japanese personas because there ''is [[documentation]] of the Japanese being in Europe at that time''. It may be minimal documentation, but it is documentation nonetheless!

Revision as of 17:52, 14 August 2003

During period, Europe had only limited contact and trade with Asia and there are, relatively, few people with Asian personas in the SCA. Although there was minimal contact between Europe and Asia during period, this does not mean that Asian personas are forbidden.

Some people may take issue with Japanese personas, because there are only twelve documented instances of people from Japan visiting Europe in period. Conversely, it can also be argued that there should not be a problem with Japanese personas because there is documentation of the Japanese being in Europe at that time. It may be minimal documentation, but it is documentation nonetheless!