Talk:Appleholm: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (Simonm moved page Talk:Whyt Whey to Talk:Appleholm: The Canton of Whyt Whey recently changed its name to Appleholm) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yes, the emblazon appears to be wrong. The blazon lists the chief as embattled, I'll find a better picture at some point unless someone else does. [[User:AlexandreDavigne|AlexandreDavigne]] 03:30, 4 November 2006 (EST) |
Yes, the emblazon appears to be wrong. The blazon lists the chief as embattled, I'll find a better picture at some point unless someone else does. [[User:AlexandreDavigne|AlexandreDavigne]] 03:30, 4 November 2006 (EST) |
||
What, no discussion of "Verminy" in the heraldry? Or was that an urban myth? :) --[[User:Sabine|Sabine]] 05:46, 4 November 2006 (EST) |
|||
:As near as I recall, the idea of "semy of roaches" was bandied about -- which sounds 'verminy' to me. I think it was abandoned on the theory that no one would want to draw it:-) [[User:AlexandreDavigne|AlexandreDavigne]] 06:07, 4 November 2006 (EST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:29, 20 January 2024
Yes, the emblazon appears to be wrong. The blazon lists the chief as embattled, I'll find a better picture at some point unless someone else does. AlexandreDavigne 03:30, 4 November 2006 (EST)
What, no discussion of "Verminy" in the heraldry? Or was that an urban myth? :) --Sabine 05:46, 4 November 2006 (EST)
- As near as I recall, the idea of "semy of roaches" was bandied about -- which sounds 'verminy' to me. I think it was abandoned on the theory that no one would want to draw it:-) AlexandreDavigne 06:07, 4 November 2006 (EST)
