Full-deckism: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Anybody else want to add some?) |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A full-deckism is a term used to describe somebody who ''isn't all there''. It is derived from the phrase ''not playing with a full deck''. |
A '''full-deckism''' is a term used to describe somebody who ''isn't all there''. It is derived from the phrase ''not playing with a full deck''. |
||
== |
==[[SCA]] full-deckisms== |
||
* Not the sharpest sword in the armoury |
* Not the sharpest [[sword]] in the [[armoury]] |
||
* He has a few |
* He has a few [[fighter]]s missing in the [[shield wall]] |
||
* He's a few points short of a coronet |
* He's a few points short of a [[coronet]] |
||
* A few kicks short of a [[galliard]] |
|||
* Off to invade [[Russia]] again |
|||
* In the front line of the [[France|French]] [[charge]] at [[Agincourt]] |
|||
* [[Nutbar with extra almonds]] |
|||
[[category:SCAism]] |
|||
== External links == |
|||
* [http://winn.com/bs/fulldeck.html An exhaustive list] of full-deckisms. |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:25, 18 January 2007
A full-deckism is a term used to describe somebody who isn't all there. It is derived from the phrase not playing with a full deck.
SCA full-deckisms
- Not the sharpest sword in the armoury
- He has a few fighters missing in the shield wall
- He's a few points short of a coronet
- A few kicks short of a galliard
- Off to invade Russia again
- In the front line of the French charge at Agincourt
- Nutbar with extra almonds
External links
- An exhaustive list of full-deckisms.
