Abatement: Difference between revisions
m (grammar nitpick (I can be neurotic too!)) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[heraldry]] an '''abatement''' is a mark on a [[device]] indicating some form of dishonour. Where abatements are a charge, the tincture of that charge will be one of the [[stains]] in order to indicate a stain on the bearer's honour. |
In [[heraldry]] an '''abatement''' is a mark on a [[device]] indicating some form of dishonour. Where abatements are a charge, the tincture of that charge will be one of the [[stains]] in order to indicate a stain on the bearer's honour. |
||
Abatements are described by [[Fox-Davies]] as ''one of those pleasant idiocies that has done so much to the detriment of heraldry''. In spite of being included in numerous |
Abatements are described by [[Fox-Davies]] as ''one of those pleasant idiocies that has done so much to the detriment of heraldry''. In spite of being included in numerous [[book]]s on heraldry in [[period]], the only abatement that appears to have been used in period is the [[inverted shield]] for treachery, and that not willingly (there are extremely isolated occurences of abatements in [[Scotland]] in the modern era). It is generally accepted that as it would be better to have no [[arms]] at all rather than arms with an abatement, the only place they ever really existed were in [[herald]]s' minds. |
||
*[[Delf]] |
*[[Delf]] |
||
Latest revision as of 14:34, 13 June 2013
In heraldry an abatement is a mark on a device indicating some form of dishonour. Where abatements are a charge, the tincture of that charge will be one of the stains in order to indicate a stain on the bearer's honour.
Abatements are described by Fox-Davies as one of those pleasant idiocies that has done so much to the detriment of heraldry. In spite of being included in numerous books on heraldry in period, the only abatement that appears to have been used in period is the inverted shield for treachery, and that not willingly (there are extremely isolated occurences of abatements in Scotland in the modern era). It is generally accepted that as it would be better to have no arms at all rather than arms with an abatement, the only place they ever really existed were in heralds' minds.
