Scholastics: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
m (Reverted edits by 74.208.11.169 (Talk); changed back to last version by User 144)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
See also [[Humanists]], [[Humanism]], and [[Renaissance]].
See also [[Humanists]], [[Humanism]], and [[Renaissance]].


It is a commonly held belief amongst [[Humanists]] that all scholastics are stupid. Actually, it is not but [[User:Del]] put that statement here to wind up [[User::Anton]].
It is a commonly held belief amongst [[Humanists]] (and [[User:Del]]) that all scholastics are tendentious, irrelevant, out-dated, dusty old stick-in-the-muds who argue and dispute about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

See [[Scholasticism]] for a a robust defence of the Scholastics by [[User:Anton]]
[[category:sciences]]

Latest revision as of 09:48, 10 November 2007

Scholastics -- followers of Scholasticism.

See also Humanists, Humanism, and Renaissance.

It is a commonly held belief amongst Humanists (and User:Del) that all scholastics are tendentious, irrelevant, out-dated, dusty old stick-in-the-muds who argue and dispute about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

See Scholasticism for a a robust defence of the Scholastics by User:Anton