Talk:Twee: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
While I'm sure Terry Pratchett has popularised this word in the north american context, i know I've used twee on occasion since childhood. |
While I'm sure Terry Pratchett has popularised this word in the north american context, i know I've used twee on occasion since childhood. |
||
Also, do we need to use "smalls" here or anywhere else other than in a definintion of itself and children? I don't see any gain over using children, which is medieval and non-regional (smalls isn't used in Australian SCA). |
Also, do we need to use "[[smalls]]" here or anywhere else other than in a definintion of itself and children? I don't see any gain over using children, which is medieval and non-regional (smalls isn't used in Australian SCA). |
||
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] (who know she should just edit the article, but is lazy) |
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] (who know she should just edit the article, but is lazy) |
||
Revision as of 17:20, 27 March 2006
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twee
While I'm sure Terry Pratchett has popularised this word in the north american context, i know I've used twee on occasion since childhood.
Also, do we need to use "smalls" here or anywhere else other than in a definintion of itself and children? I don't see any gain over using children, which is medieval and non-regional (smalls isn't used in Australian SCA).
Tiff (who know she should just edit the article, but is lazy)
