Difference between revisions of "Talk:SwordMaiden.com"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Would this page qualify to remain, just seems to be an advertisement for a related SCA website with no information.... opinions? [[User:Donngal|Donngal]] 16:56, 4 January 2011 (EST)
 
Would this page qualify to remain, just seems to be an advertisement for a related SCA website with no information.... opinions? [[User:Donngal|Donngal]] 16:56, 4 January 2011 (EST)
  +
* The article was added by the late [[User:Kottr|Kottr]]. She may have had something to do with the webpage it relates to but the site is presently down, so I can't comment on whether it is still valid. However, I support including a good site that looks at SCA combat from a woman's point-of-view. Whether it deserves its own article is another thing. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 20:38, 8 January 2011 (EST)

Latest revision as of 19:38, 8 January 2011

Would this page qualify to remain, just seems to be an advertisement for a related SCA website with no information.... opinions? Donngal 16:56, 4 January 2011 (EST)

  • The article was added by the late Kottr. She may have had something to do with the webpage it relates to but the site is presently down, so I can't comment on whether it is still valid. However, I support including a good site that looks at SCA combat from a woman's point-of-view. Whether it deserves its own article is another thing. - Cian Gillebhrath 20:38, 8 January 2011 (EST)