Talk:Stains: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I don't know of any precedent or justification for including stains beyond tenne, sanguine or murrey; the others are just very unusual colours, usually of later vintage than those typically given. --[[User:Daniel C. Boyer|Daniel C. Boyer]] 10:24, 12 Dec 2005 (CST)
I don't know of any precedent or justification for including stains beyond tenne, sanguine or murrey; the others are just very unusual colours, usually of later vintage than those typically given. --[[User:Daniel C. Boyer|Daniel C. Boyer]] 10:24, 12 Dec 2005 (CST)

My understanding of the other stains is that they were used in Continental heraldry. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 19:30, 13 Dec 2005 (CST)

Revision as of 11:30, 14 December 2005

I don't know of any precedent or justification for including stains beyond tenne, sanguine or murrey; the others are just very unusual colours, usually of later vintage than those typically given. --Daniel C. Boyer 10:24, 12 Dec 2005 (CST)

My understanding of the other stains is that they were used in Continental heraldry. Conrad Leviston 19:30, 13 Dec 2005 (CST)