Difference between revisions of "Talk:Norman shield"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Thanks, I think this does add in the spirit of what i was trying to say - I deleted because I had gotten too  far into unfounded speculation and couldn't find a line to take it back to.
 
Thanks, I think this does add in the spirit of what i was trying to say - I deleted because I had gotten too  far into unfounded speculation and couldn't find a line to take it back to.
 
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] 23:15, 12 Apr 2005 (CDT)
 
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] 23:15, 12 Apr 2005 (CDT)
 +
 +
15th Century Norman shields? Can someone direct me to a reference for that?

Revision as of 00:41, 23 January 2006

Conrad :: please feel free to delete anything you want rid of. I've rather gone on a bit.
--Simoncursitor 09:05, 6 Apr 2005 (CDT)

In the spirit of wiki's I don't see anything that needs to be deleted. I may get around to rewording a little, but it's all good information and should stay. I also intend to get around to writing something about its use in SCA combat. Most articles on Cunnan are too short anyway. Conrad Leviston 18:54, 8 Apr 2005 (CDT)

Thanks, I think this does add in the spirit of what i was trying to say - I deleted because I had gotten too far into unfounded speculation and couldn't find a line to take it back to. Tiff 23:15, 12 Apr 2005 (CDT)

15th Century Norman shields? Can someone direct me to a reference for that?