Talk:Law: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the past when I created this page, I made a separate page for [[law]] and [[laws]]. I think this distinction needs to be made a little clearer on [[law|this page]]. In my mind, ''[[law]]'' is the field and how the related legal system works and what ideologies etc are behind it. ''[[Laws]]'' are the rules they relate to. I know this goes against the general practice for [[Cunnan]] of not using plural nouns for page titles, but I felt they needed separate pages. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 11:16, 26 Apr 2006 (EST) |
In the past when I created this page, I made a separate page for [[law]] and [[laws]]. I think this distinction needs to be made a little clearer on [[law|this page]]. In my mind, ''[[law]]'' is the field and how the related legal system works and what ideologies etc are behind it. ''[[Laws]]'' are the rules they relate to. I know this goes against the general practice for [[Cunnan]] of not using plural nouns for page titles, but I felt they needed separate pages. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 11:16, 26 Apr 2006 (EST) |
||
Aren't SCA "laws" better described as rules as they are not backed by a government?--[[User:User 144|User 144]] 22:26, 8 March 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 21:26, 8 March 2007
In the past when I created this page, I made a separate page for law and laws. I think this distinction needs to be made a little clearer on this page. In my mind, law is the field and how the related legal system works and what ideologies etc are behind it. Laws are the rules they relate to. I know this goes against the general practice for Cunnan of not using plural nouns for page titles, but I felt they needed separate pages. - Cian Gillebhrath 11:16, 26 Apr 2006 (EST)
Aren't SCA "laws" better described as rules as they are not backed by a government?--User 144 22:26, 8 March 2007 (EST)
