Talk:Kingdom of Æthelmearc: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (signed) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I understand why Tobin did the ordered list thing, but I think we should either go with the original way the royalty list was entered, or else list Lady protector first, followed by Princes and Princesses, followed by Kings and Queens, in order to maintain overall chronological order.[[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] |
I understand why Tobin did the ordered list thing, but I think we should either go with the original way the royalty list was entered, or else list Lady protector first, followed by Princes and Princesses, followed by Kings and Queens, in order to maintain overall chronological order.[[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] |
||
That makes sense to me. - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 07:42, 4 June 2004
I understand why Tobin did the ordered list thing, but I think we should either go with the original way the royalty list was entered, or else list Lady protector first, followed by Princes and Princesses, followed by Kings and Queens, in order to maintain overall chronological order.Conrad Leviston
That makes sense to me. - Tobin
