Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gemstones"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
 
m (Agree with simon)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
Also, though not technically a gem, '''amber''' ?
 
Also, though not technically a gem, '''amber''' ?
  +
  +
:I'd say yes to both. Although amber is of vegetable origin I don't see why it shouldn't be classed as a mineral. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 09:46, 9 Oct 2004 (EST)

Revision as of 10:46, 9 October 2004

Brief query -- ought some reference be made to lapis, which was known from Ancient Egypt onward ?

Also, though not technically a gem, amber ?

I'd say yes to both. Although amber is of vegetable origin I don't see why it shouldn't be classed as a mineral. Conrad Leviston 09:46, 9 Oct 2004 (EST)