Difference between revisions of "Talk:Army"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
(Cian's wish list)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
:Sergeant. As far as I can tell it's not a question of US vs. UK spelling. Organi'''z'''ation on the other hand is, so I have left it. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 08:13, 19 Oct 2005 (CDT)
 
:Sergeant. As far as I can tell it's not a question of US vs. UK spelling. Organi'''z'''ation on the other hand is, so I have left it. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 08:13, 19 Oct 2005 (CDT)
  +
----
  +
Okay, what I would like added to this page is trivial information like:
  +
* Who had standing [[army|armies]]? e.g. [[barony|baronies]]? [[kingdom]]s? [[city-state]]s?
  +
* What jobs formed a [[period]] army? e.g. [[archer]]s, [[engineer]]s, washerwomen, [[bodyguard]]s, [[falconer]]s?
  +
* What resources were carried with an army? e.g. [[tent]]s, [[throne]]s, [[pigeon]] coops?
  +
* Were armies generally for offense or defense?
  +
I don't know any of this details but I believe people like [[Anton de Stoc|Anton]] do. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 18:52, 19 Oct 2005 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:52, 20 October 2005

"sargent" or "sergeant" ?

Sergeant. As far as I can tell it's not a question of US vs. UK spelling. Organization on the other hand is, so I have left it. Conrad Leviston 08:13, 19 Oct 2005 (CDT)

Okay, what I would like added to this page is trivial information like:

I don't know any of this details but I believe people like Anton do. - Cian Gillebhrath 18:52, 19 Oct 2005 (CDT)