Shoes: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
Shoes are given the least amount of effort by most people in the [[SCA]]. As they are expensive to have made, many people do not see them as a viable part of their portrayal. However, the making of shoes (particularly turnshoes) is relatively simple once the pattern has been made. There are multiple websites with historical patterns on them.
Shoes are given the least amount of effort by most people in the [[SCA]]. As they are expensive to have made, many people do not see them as a viable part of their portrayal. However, the making of shoes (particularly turnshoes) is relatively simple once the pattern has been made. There are multiple websites with historical patterns on them.


==Shoes in Re-Enactment==
Period shoes are considered ''de rigour'' for most [[metal weapons groups|re-enactment groups]]. The adage: ''Clothes maketh the man'' has been reappropriated to become ''Shoes maketh the man''. Any re-enactment group not making the effort to ensure that their shoes are historically accurate are not generally taken as a serious group.

Making their own shoes is considered a right of passage by some groups as they learn that shoemaking is not a difficult task nor is it an expensive one.
Arguments that period shoes are dangerous are typically based on supposed ankle injuries whilst wearing armour, but do not seem to be born out by the numerous re-enactors wearing them every weekend.

Movement whilst wearing period shoes changes slightly and a greater understanding of combat is gained from the experience.


''See also:''
''See also:''

Revision as of 18:07, 6 March 2006

Shoes are an item of costume designed to protect the feet. There were many types of footwear worn in period, with different types of construction. For people wearing outfits from before about 1400 what we call 'Turned Shoes' were the most commonly worn, especially among the higher social classes. For people wearing outfits set after 1500, the most commonly worn sort of shoe was what we today call 'Welted Shoes'.

Turned shoes were single-sole shoes that to modern sensibilities often seem like slippers or moccasins, and are therefore dismissed. They were made inside out, then turned right-side out. These were frequently made on a last (or a specially carved wooden form), especially after the 1200s, although a last is not always required. Some later period shoes were given added outer soles that helped them last longer.

Welted shoes were made in a more modern fashion, right-side out, on a last. Separate raised heels are not found until after 1600 (except in some rare occurrences regarding carved wooden or cork soles in the 16th century).

Shoemakers (or Cordwainers) and Cobblers are not the same thing. Shoemakers were required to work in new leather, while Cobblers were required to work in old, used leather. There were serious class distinctions between the two.

Overshoes called pattens were made of wood with a leather strap or leather and cork (somewhat like a modern Berkeinstock). They raise the foot up off the ground immediately below ones sole, thereby extending the life of the shoes and preventing one's foot from getting wet in damp conditions.

The English term "Cobbler" and German name "Schubach" both mean "repairer of shoes".

Shoes in the SCA

Shoes are given the least amount of effort by most people in the SCA. As they are expensive to have made, many people do not see them as a viable part of their portrayal. However, the making of shoes (particularly turnshoes) is relatively simple once the pattern has been made. There are multiple websites with historical patterns on them.

Shoes in Re-Enactment

Period shoes are considered de rigour for most re-enactment groups. The adage: Clothes maketh the man has been reappropriated to become Shoes maketh the man. Any re-enactment group not making the effort to ensure that their shoes are historically accurate are not generally taken as a serious group.

Making their own shoes is considered a right of passage by some groups as they learn that shoemaking is not a difficult task nor is it an expensive one. Arguments that period shoes are dangerous are typically based on supposed ankle injuries whilst wearing armour, but do not seem to be born out by the numerous re-enactors wearing them every weekend.

Movement whilst wearing period shoes changes slightly and a greater understanding of combat is gained from the experience.

See also:

External Links

Footwear of the Middle ages - http://www.personal.utulsa.edu/~marc-carlson/shoe/SHOEHOME.HTM (there are more extensive links there)