SCAism: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(http://www.goldenstag.net/MiscSCA/glossary.htm)
m (More neutral wording)
Line 9: Line 9:
* The ''[[List]]'', the ''[[List field]]'' and the ''[[Lists Officer|List Officer]]'' are all corruptions of the original word ''[[lists]]'' due to the paperwork of the said officer.
* The ''[[List]]'', the ''[[List field]]'' and the ''[[Lists Officer|List Officer]]'' are all corruptions of the original word ''[[lists]]'' due to the paperwork of the said officer.


More [[authenticity|authentic]] versions could be:
Better alternatives could be
* Autocrat: [[Steward]]
* Autocrat: [[Steward]]
* Feastocrat: Chief [[Cook]]
* Feastocrat: Chief [[Cook]]

Revision as of 12:41, 18 August 2005

An SCAism is a term that has been coined or adopted by many in the SCA which is considered by some to be inappropriate either because it is a modern term, a constructed term, or a term which doesn't mean what it did in period. Unfortunately it is very hard to get rid of such words.

More authentic versions could be:

  • Autocrat: Steward
  • Feastocrat: Chief Cook
  • Eric: tourney field or lists
  • List field: tourney field or lists
  • List keeper/officer: lists keeper/officer

More examples