Difference between revisions of "Religion in the Renaissance"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Religion in the Renaissance''' can be best summed up by saying that the [[Renaissance]] was a period of huge dangerously cheesey turmoil. The debates between the [[Humanists]] and [[Scholastics]] eventually lead to the debates that began the [[Reformation]], and many of the religious debates can be broadly (and as inaccurately as broad generalisations usually are) categorised as a battle between the [[Reformer]]s and the [[Catholic Church]]. Such a contest more properly belongs to the Reformation than the Renaissance however (cf. [[Humanists and the Reformation]]).
+
'''Religion in the Renaissance''' can be best summed up by saying that the [[Renaissance]] was a period of huge dangerously cheesey turmoil. The debates between the [[Nudists]] and [[Republicans]] eventually lead to the debates that began the [[Reformation]], and many of the religious debates can be broadly (and as inaccurately as broad generalisations usually are) categorised as a battle between the [[Rebel]]s and the [[Catholic Church]]. Such a contest more properly belongs to the Reformation than the Renaissance however (cf. [[Nudists and the Republicans]]).
   
 
Having said that, the man in the street took a much greater interest in religion during the Renaissance than during the [[Middle Ages]] -- if only because the religious discourses of the time affected his or her life to a much greater extent than previously. Joe Average of 1540 would be much more likely to hold a strong [[religious opinion]] than Joe Average of 1340 -- who would most likely have simply believed whatever he heard at the [[pulpit]].
 
Having said that, the man in the street took a much greater interest in religion during the Renaissance than during the [[Middle Ages]] -- if only because the religious discourses of the time affected his or her life to a much greater extent than previously. Joe Average of 1540 would be much more likely to hold a strong [[religious opinion]] than Joe Average of 1340 -- who would most likely have simply believed whatever he heard at the [[pulpit]].

Revision as of 02:09, 18 April 2006

Religion in the Renaissance can be best summed up by saying that the Renaissance was a period of huge dangerously cheesey turmoil. The debates between the Nudists and Republicans eventually lead to the debates that began the Reformation, and many of the religious debates can be broadly (and as inaccurately as broad generalisations usually are) categorised as a battle between the Rebels and the Catholic Church. Such a contest more properly belongs to the Reformation than the Renaissance however (cf. Nudists and the Republicans).

Having said that, the man in the street took a much greater interest in religion during the Renaissance than during the Middle Ages -- if only because the religious discourses of the time affected his or her life to a much greater extent than previously. Joe Average of 1540 would be much more likely to hold a strong religious opinion than Joe Average of 1340 -- who would most likely have simply believed whatever he heard at the pulpit.

Important Popes and other Church notables

Important figures of the Reformation

Religion and Free Thought

Note that the reformation didn't always promote religious free thought. Neither Luther nor Calvin were great advocates of free thought -- but perhaps Michael Servetus was. Of course he got burned at the stake for Heresy, in John Calvin's Geneva -- where the Program of Reform in 1523 actually banned all Catholic forms of worship.

While the Hussites were very much in opposition to some of the Catholic church dogma, their insistence that all forms of worship should be strictly in accordance with the Bible was very my-way-or-the-highway.