Difference between revisions of "Order of Precedence"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (clarification of explanation)
(An Tir OoP)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Note that if person A had received a [[laurel]] and a [[pelican]] in the last year, an person B had received a [[laurel]] three years ago, person B would be ranked higher, having reached peerage level first. The fact that someone has obtained a second award at a certain level does not add to their precedence.
 
Note that if person A had received a [[laurel]] and a [[pelican]] in the last year, an person B had received a [[laurel]] three years ago, person B would be ranked higher, having reached peerage level first. The fact that someone has obtained a second award at a certain level does not add to their precedence.
   
The Lochac Order of Precedence can be located at: http://www.sca.org.au/herald/php/OP.php
+
The Order of Precedence can be located at:
  +
* [[An Tir]] http://www.antirheralds.org/awards/OP/op.html
  +
* [[Lochac]] http://www.sca.org.au/herald/php/OP.php

Revision as of 12:36, 4 November 2003

The order of Precedence is a listing of all the people who have received awards within the SCA, ordered from the highest ranking to the lowest. Ranking (or precedence) is determined by the highest level of award received, and the date an award of that level was first given to the recipient. The earlier a person received an award, the higher they appear on the order of precedence.

The ranking of awards, from highest to lowest, are:

Note that if person A had received a laurel and a pelican in the last year, an person B had received a laurel three years ago, person B would be ranked higher, having reached peerage level first. The fact that someone has obtained a second award at a certain level does not add to their precedence.

The Order of Precedence can be located at: