Difference between revisions of "Italian Renaissance"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(wiki)
m (format, removed personal attribution.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Anton here :
+
The '''Italian Renaissance''' was something of a fad among [[Italian]] princes and [[merchant]] princes for blowing huge chunks of the family fortune on nice [[art]], country [[houses]] and general good living.
  
A fad among [[Italian]] princes and merchant princes for blowing huge chunks of the family fortune on nice art, country houses and general good living.
+
This was fundamentally brought on by a lack of good other places to put your [[money]], due to a sustained commercial crisis combining a [[trade|trading]] depression in the [[Mediterranean]] and a fall in interest rates (down to 0.25% pa in [[Florence]]).
  
This was fundamentally brought on by a lack of good other places to put your money, due to a sustained commercial crisis combining a trading depression in the Mediterranean and a fall in interest rates (down to 0.25% pa in [[Florence]]).
+
The period also saw a 'culture war' between the Humanists and the Scholastics, and as the Humanists concentrated on winning the argument rather than having their facts and logic straight, they successfully painted the 'moderns' (ie the Scholastics) as backward relics of the dark medieval era and the Humanists therefore got all the cool jobs as [[Court Poets]], [[Historians]] and so on.
  
The period also saw a 'culture war' between the Humanists and the Scholastics, and as the Humanists concentrated on winning the argument rather than having their facts and logic straight, they successfully painted the 'moderns' (ie the Scholastics) as backward relics of the dark medieval era ... and therefore the Humanists got all the cool jobs as Court Poets, Historians and so on.
+
The combination of the physical evidence of the changes in [[fashion]] evident in the new art, styles of houses and so on, combined with the documentary "evidence" of the polemics of the Humanists caused it to be mistaken for an intermediate period between the medieval and modern worlds by [[nineteenth century]] historians (especially [[Burkhardt]]). [[Medievalist]]s are still trying to repair the damage.
  
The combination of the physical evidence of the changes in fashion evident in the new art, styles of houses and so on, combined with the documentary "evidence" of the polemics of the Humanists caused it to be mistaken for an intermediate period between the medieval and modern worlds by nineteenth century historians (esp Burkhardt). Medievalists are still trying to repair the damage.
+
== Related topics ==
 +
* [[Renaissance]]

Revision as of 15:54, 5 November 2003

The Italian Renaissance was something of a fad among Italian princes and merchant princes for blowing huge chunks of the family fortune on nice art, country houses and general good living.

This was fundamentally brought on by a lack of good other places to put your money, due to a sustained commercial crisis combining a trading depression in the Mediterranean and a fall in interest rates (down to 0.25% pa in Florence).

The period also saw a 'culture war' between the Humanists and the Scholastics, and as the Humanists concentrated on winning the argument rather than having their facts and logic straight, they successfully painted the 'moderns' (ie the Scholastics) as backward relics of the dark medieval era and the Humanists therefore got all the cool jobs as Court Poets, Historians and so on.

The combination of the physical evidence of the changes in fashion evident in the new art, styles of houses and so on, combined with the documentary "evidence" of the polemics of the Humanists caused it to be mistaken for an intermediate period between the medieval and modern worlds by nineteenth century historians (especially Burkhardt). Medievalists are still trying to repair the damage.

Related topics