InterKingdom Anthropology: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


"I'm afraid that this is IKA, since <your example> does not apply <in some other locality.>"
"I'm afraid that this is IKA, since <your example> does not apply <in some other locality.>"

Many [[tradition]]s, known in one place to be [[The One True Way]], are actually IKA.


===Examples of IKA===
===Examples of IKA===
Line 17: Line 19:
*The use of a particular [[vivat|cheer]] or acclamation.
*The use of a particular [[vivat|cheer]] or acclamation.
*The use of coloured [[belt]]s (other than a [[white belt]]) to denote one's status as a [[Squire]], [[Apprentice]] or [[Protege]].
*The use of coloured [[belt]]s (other than a [[white belt]]) to denote one's status as a [[Squire]], [[Apprentice]] or [[Protege]].
*The wearing of [[fealty chain | chains of fealty]] by those in fealty to the Crown.


[[Category: SCAism]]
[[Category: SCAism]]

Latest revision as of 04:01, 10 December 2011

InterKingdom Anthropology (IKA) is a term au courant on the usenet group rec.org.sca (sometimes called the Rialto) as well as other electronic forums. It refers somewhat lightheartedly to the study of regional and kingdom differences in the SCA. Often it is used in the form of a disclaimer as in

"This may be an exercise in InterKingdom Anthropology, but locally ..."

The other usage is the flip side of the first, and IKA is invoked when someone has referred to local custom as universal truth, as in

"I'm afraid that this is IKA, since <your example> does not apply <in some other locality.>"

Many traditions, known in one place to be The One True Way, are actually IKA.

Examples of IKA