InterKingdom Anthropology: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 10: Line 10:


*Whether or not one should "[[bow]] to furniture," that is to say whether the [[custom]] is to [[reverence]] unoccupied [[throne]]s.
*Whether or not one should "[[bow]] to furniture," that is to say whether the [[custom]] is to [[reverence]] unoccupied [[throne]]s.
*Frequency of "naked" [[Grant of Arms|Grants of Arms]]
*Frequency of "naked" [[Grant of Arms|Grants of Arms]].
*Placement of [[Court Baron]]ies within the [[Order of Precedence]] and, indeed, the awarding of such Baronies with or without a [[Grant of Arms]].
*Certain [[sumptuary law|sumptuary]] customs, for instance those governing the wearing of [[circlet]]s.
*Certain [[sumptuary law|sumptuary]] customs, for instance those governing the wearing of [[circlet]]s.
*The use of the term [[The Eric]] and associated Ericisms.
*The use of the term [[The Eric]] and associated Ericisms.

Revision as of 12:01, 11 July 2008

InterKingdom Anthropology (IKA) is a term au courant on the usenet group rec.org.sca (sometimes called the Rialto) as well as other electronic forums. It refers somewhat lightheartedly to the study of regional and kingdom differences in the SCA. Often it is used in the form of a disclaimer as in

"This may be an exercise in InterKingdom Anthropology, but locally ..."

The other usage is the flip side of the first, and IKA is invoked when someone has referred to local custom as universal truth, as in

"I'm afraid that this is IKA, since <your example> does not apply <in some other locality.>"

Examples of IKA