Full-deckism: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (OK cormac how about those) |
m (Nutbar with extra almonds) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A full-deckism is a term used to describe somebody who ''isn't all there''. It is derived from the phrase ''not playing with a full deck''. Here is [http://winn.com/bs/fulldeck.html an exhaustive list of full-deckisms]. |
A full-deckism is a term used to describe somebody who ''isn't all there''. It is derived from the phrase ''not playing with a full deck''. Here is [http://winn.com/bs/fulldeck.html an exhaustive list of full-deckisms]. |
||
==SCA full-deckisms== |
|||
* Not the sharpest sword in the armoury |
* Not the sharpest sword in the armoury |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Off to invade Russia again |
* Off to invade Russia again |
||
* In the front line of the French charge at Agincourt |
* In the front line of the French charge at Agincourt |
||
* [[Nutbar with extra almonds]] |
|||
Revision as of 12:52, 9 October 2004
A full-deckism is a term used to describe somebody who isn't all there. It is derived from the phrase not playing with a full deck. Here is an exhaustive list of full-deckisms.
SCA full-deckisms
- Not the sharpest sword in the armoury
- He has a few fighters missing in the shield wall
- He's a few points short of a coronet
- A few kicks short of a galliard
- Off to invade Russia again
- In the front line of the French charge at Agincourt
- Nutbar with extra almonds
