Difference between revisions of "Category talk:People"

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(proposed category definitions)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
A general discussion of categorization ideas is needed. - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] 23:48, 9 Jun 2004 (EST)
 
A general discussion of categorization ideas is needed. - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] 23:48, 9 Jun 2004 (EST)
  +
  +
* Since nothing seems to be decided here, how about
  +
: [[:Category:People]] - period people eg. [[William Marshall]], [[Henry II]], all the troubadours
  +
: [[:Category: SCA People]] - SCA personna eg. [[Baron Gwynfor]] , [[User:Tiff|Teffania]] (make a subset of Category:People)
  +
:If you want, there can be a subset of [[:Category:SCA peers]] but I think that all SCA people should be still included in the Category:SCA People. If [[NVG]] or other groups who contribute or have pages written about them can include a [[:Category:NVG People]] subset of the main page if they want. I don't think there needs to be a category for SCA groups of people.
  +
:- [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 12:11, 30 Aug 2004 (EST)

Revision as of 12:11, 30 August 2004

This might not be the best thought out category. Should actual humans go into Category:Players or something similar? Perhaps this category should be Category:Groups of people in the SCA.

A general discussion of categorization ideas is needed. - Tobin 23:48, 9 Jun 2004 (EST)

  • Since nothing seems to be decided here, how about
Category:People - period people eg. William Marshall, Henry II, all the troubadours
Category: SCA People - SCA personna eg. Baron Gwynfor , Teffania (make a subset of Category:People)
If you want, there can be a subset of Category:SCA peers but I think that all SCA people should be still included in the Category:SCA People. If NVG or other groups who contribute or have pages written about them can include a Category:NVG People subset of the main page if they want. I don't think there needs to be a category for SCA groups of people.
- Cian Gillebhrath 12:11, 30 Aug 2004 (EST)