Category talk:Combat: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Cian's concerns for this category) |
(response) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Should we be careful to break up the members into further [[SCA]]-specific categories? Should there be a general [[:category:combat]] and a [[:category:combat (SCA)]]? |
Should we be careful to break up the members into further [[SCA]]-specific categories? Should there be a general [[:category:combat]] and a [[:category:combat (SCA)]]? |
||
- [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 01:15, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT) |
- [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 01:15, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT) |
||
Those are good ideas, Cian. I'd go for the subdivisions - what do other people think? |
|||
- [[User:Morgant|Morgant]] 01:27, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 16:27, 12 August 2005
This category has always given me concern, which is why I have never defined it or made many members for it. There are many possible members for it, but I wonder if it should have a number of subcategories or be really subdivided. For instance, members could be
But we already have categories for
Should we be careful to break up the members into further SCA-specific categories? Should there be a general category:combat and a category:combat (SCA)?
- Cian Gillebhrath 01:15, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT)
Those are good ideas, Cian. I'd go for the subdivisions - what do other people think?
- Morgant 01:27, 12 Aug 2005 (CDT)
