Cadency: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
* for the eighth son, a [[cross moline]]
* for the eighth son, a [[cross moline]]
* for the ninth son, a double [[quatrefoil]]
* for the ninth son, a double [[quatrefoil]]
Typically brisures were displayed as smaller than other [[charge]]s.
More elaborate systems of cadency were in place for the various sons of sons, all the way down to the ninth son of a ninth son.


[[Scotland|Scottish]] heraldry used a very different system, often changing [[bordure]]s and [[tincture]] to accomodate changes.
[[Scotland|Scottish]] heraldry used a very different system, often changing [[bordure]]s and [[tincture]] to accomodate changes.

More elaborate systems of cadency were in place for the various sons of sons, all the way down to the ninth son of a ninth son. Daughters in [[England|English]] heraldry received no cadency marks, as there was no perceived need to distinguish their use of the family arms.


Interestingly, when the holder of the plain arms perished, a general reshuffling of cadency marks was supposed to occur, i.e. the first son inheriting the uncadenced arms, his eldest son inheriting the [[label of three points]], and so on.
Interestingly, when the holder of the plain arms perished, a general reshuffling of cadency marks was supposed to occur, i.e. the first son inheriting the uncadenced arms, his eldest son inheriting the [[label of three points]], and so on.
Line 20: Line 22:
Despite the influence of English heraldry in the SCA, cadency marks are simply not recognized by the [[college of arms]], and any attempt to register a [[device]] with a cadency mark will likely be rejected as having an insufficient number of [[Point_of_difference|points of difference]].
Despite the influence of English heraldry in the SCA, cadency marks are simply not recognized by the [[college of arms]], and any attempt to register a [[device]] with a cadency mark will likely be rejected as having an insufficient number of [[Point_of_difference|points of difference]].


The only exception to this rule is the use of a [[label of three points]] on the arms of a Kingdom to denote the [[Crown Prince]] and [[Crown Princess|Princess]].
The only exception to this is the use of a [[label of three points]] on the arms of a Kingdom to denote the [[Crown Prince]] and [[Crown Princess|Princess]].





Latest revision as of 03:14, 5 May 2007

Cadency marks (sometimes called brisures,) were used on family arms throughout the late medieval period as a method of distinguishing the arms of a man from those of his sons, who were also entitiled to carry the family's arms.

Each regional heraldry had it's own method for determining cadency. In English heraldry the system (although not mandatory) was often displayed as follows:

  • for the first son, a label of three points (a horizontal strip with three tags hanging down)
  • for the second son, a crescent (the points upward, as is conventional in heraldry)
  • for the third son, a mullet (a five-pointed star)
  • for the fourth son, a martlet (a kind of bird)
  • for the fifth son, an annulet (a ring)
  • for the sixth son, a fleur-de-lys
  • for the seventh son, a rose
  • for the eighth son, a cross moline
  • for the ninth son, a double quatrefoil

Typically brisures were displayed as smaller than other charges.

Scottish heraldry used a very different system, often changing bordures and tincture to accomodate changes.

More elaborate systems of cadency were in place for the various sons of sons, all the way down to the ninth son of a ninth son. Daughters in English heraldry received no cadency marks, as there was no perceived need to distinguish their use of the family arms.

Interestingly, when the holder of the plain arms perished, a general reshuffling of cadency marks was supposed to occur, i.e. the first son inheriting the uncadenced arms, his eldest son inheriting the label of three points, and so on.

Cadency in the SCA

Despite the influence of English heraldry in the SCA, cadency marks are simply not recognized by the college of arms, and any attempt to register a device with a cadency mark will likely be rejected as having an insufficient number of points of difference.

The only exception to this is the use of a label of three points on the arms of a Kingdom to denote the Crown Prince and Princess.