Astronomy: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (typo)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Stars (and planets) make consistent patterns. Their positions can be used to determine [[time]], date, etc. They were more signifcant during [[period]] as no one had yet come up with an explanation that explained all of the heavenly bodies motions (although several theories such as [[Ptolemy's theory of the movement of the spheres]] and the Copernican explanation were suggested). Also the absence of strong artificial light after dark meant that the display of stars was much more interesting than we currently see (from within a [[city]] at any rate)
Stars (and planets) make consistent patterns. Their positions can be used to determine [[time]], date, etc. They were more significant during [[period]] as no one had yet come up with an explanation that explained all of the heavenly bodies motions (although several theories such as [[Ptolemy's theory of the movement of the spheres]] and the Copernican explanation were suggested). Also the absence of strong artificial light after dark meant that the display of stars was much more interesting than we currently see (from within a [[city]] at any rate)


If you prefer the later Copernican explanation, then it's worth looking at the appendix in [[Leonard Digges]]' called "General Prognostication".
If you prefer the later Copernican explanation, then it's worth looking at the appendix in [[Leonard Digges]]' called "General Prognostication".

Revision as of 02:06, 5 August 2003

Stars (and planets) make consistent patterns. Their positions can be used to determine time, date, etc. They were more significant during period as no one had yet come up with an explanation that explained all of the heavenly bodies motions (although several theories such as Ptolemy's theory of the movement of the spheres and the Copernican explanation were suggested). Also the absence of strong artificial light after dark meant that the display of stars was much more interesting than we currently see (from within a city at any rate)

If you prefer the later Copernican explanation, then it's worth looking at the appendix in Leonard Digges' called "General Prognostication".

It should also be noted that astrology is at the heart of medicine in period, and was quite influential for a lot of important, well educated people (e.g Saint Thomas Aquinas - see Summa Contra Gentiles. There are rumours that Erasmus also occasionally consulted an astrologer).

Ask Rudolf von Der Drau about his astrolabe!

See also: