Cunnan talk:Lochac-centrism

From Cunnan
Revision as of 11:27, 6 January 2004 by Tobin (talk | contribs) (sounds good.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Hmmm, should we limit ourselves to Lochac centrism? It possible that at some point we will have to deal with info specific to other kingdoms. Is a more general notice needed? - Tobin 15:51, 1 Jan 2004 (EST)

  • Probably, but what should we call it? "Regionality"? "Parochiality"? "Internationalisation"? Morgant
    • Good point. There are pages that should have a regional focus because of the subject matter (e.g., An Tir) there are others that have a limited scope because they were only written from that perspective. How about we call this regional point of view or RPOV? ~ JakeVortex
      • Sounds good to me. I'll add a note about using "What links here?" to find RPOV articles. - Tobin