Talk:Renaissance: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(INFO) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Whats in style? How do you say that in Renaissance? |
Whats in style? How do you say that in Renaissance? |
||
hi, we could reply to you easier if you logged in. Anyway, I can see that the article is leggy and overgrown - full of more links than content in sections. But I'd hate to just loose the links. Perhaps the links could be shifted off to a subpage on the relevant topic (eg Renaisance poets) and just a couple of links retained for the main page. |
|||
As for your last sentence, maybe it's a crosscultural thing, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. |
|||
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] 20:48, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 13:48, 8 February 2005
You know I'd really like to take a large knife to the links section of this page.
Saying something like:
Whats in style? How do you say that in Renaissance?
hi, we could reply to you easier if you logged in. Anyway, I can see that the article is leggy and overgrown - full of more links than content in sections. But I'd hate to just loose the links. Perhaps the links could be shifted off to a subpage on the relevant topic (eg Renaisance poets) and just a couple of links retained for the main page. As for your last sentence, maybe it's a crosscultural thing, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Tiff 20:48, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)