Reticella: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The threads would be drawn from the linen leaving only equally spaced horizontal and vertical bars. The threads would be embroidered and then the lace pattern drawn on the parchment would be embroidered over the bars. It was common in the latter half of the 16th century. |
The threads would be drawn from the linen leaving only equally spaced horizontal and vertical bars. The threads would be embroidered and then the lace pattern drawn on the parchment would be embroidered over the bars. It was common in the latter half of the 16th century. |
||
One of the first pattern books containing true reticella patterns was |
One of the first pattern books containing true reticella patterns was [[Singuliers et Nouveaux Pourtraicts]], published in 1587 by Federico Vinciolo in France. |
||
Here is a link to an online facsimile: http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/vinciolo/ |
|||
A book with patterns for embroidery over open squares of linen that were smaller than the reticella squares was created in 1550 by Mathio Pagano. It was called |
A book with patterns for embroidery over open squares of linen that were smaller than the reticella squares was created in 1550 by Mathio Pagano. It was called [[Giardinetto Novo Di Ponti Tagliati Et Gropposi per Exercito e Ornamento Delle Donne]]. Here is a link to an online facsimile: |
||
http://www.cs.arizona.edu/patterns/weaving/books/ngl_lace.pdf |
|||
When later, more open forms of needle lace were created, they did not replace the earlier forms of lace. The earlier forms of lace were still being created and used. This is why it is difficult to date 16th century lace to a more exact date within the 16th century. |
When later, more open forms of needle lace were created, they did not replace the earlier forms of lace. The earlier forms of lace were still being created and used. This is why it is difficult to date 16th century lace to a more exact date within the 16th century. |
||
Many books with embroidery and lace patterns were published in the 16th century. Lace patterns from one book would appear in anther, even if the other book was published years later in a different country by a different auther. An example of this is the pelican in her piety pattern from Singuliers. |
Many books with embroidery and lace patterns were published in the 16th century. Lace patterns from one book would appear in anther, even if the other book was published years later in a different country by a different auther. An example of this is the pelican in her piety pattern from Singuliers. This pattern is also included in [[Corona delle Nobili et Virtuose Donne]] published in Italy by Cesare Vecellio and also in [[A Schole-House for the Needle]] published in England in 1632. |
||
The pattern books cannot be used to date the earliest time a lace pattern appeared. According to Santina Levey in [[Lace, A History]], the pattern books contained 'tried and true' patterns because they were designed for the amateur, not the professional lace maker. |
Revision as of 08:28, 2 January 2010
Reticella lace was created by sewing linen to a piece of parchment with a lace pattern drawn on it. The threads would be drawn from the linen leaving only equally spaced horizontal and vertical bars. The threads would be embroidered and then the lace pattern drawn on the parchment would be embroidered over the bars. It was common in the latter half of the 16th century.
One of the first pattern books containing true reticella patterns was Singuliers et Nouveaux Pourtraicts, published in 1587 by Federico Vinciolo in France. Here is a link to an online facsimile: http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/vinciolo/
A book with patterns for embroidery over open squares of linen that were smaller than the reticella squares was created in 1550 by Mathio Pagano. It was called Giardinetto Novo Di Ponti Tagliati Et Gropposi per Exercito e Ornamento Delle Donne. Here is a link to an online facsimile: http://www.cs.arizona.edu/patterns/weaving/books/ngl_lace.pdf
When later, more open forms of needle lace were created, they did not replace the earlier forms of lace. The earlier forms of lace were still being created and used. This is why it is difficult to date 16th century lace to a more exact date within the 16th century.
Many books with embroidery and lace patterns were published in the 16th century. Lace patterns from one book would appear in anther, even if the other book was published years later in a different country by a different auther. An example of this is the pelican in her piety pattern from Singuliers. This pattern is also included in Corona delle Nobili et Virtuose Donne published in Italy by Cesare Vecellio and also in A Schole-House for the Needle published in England in 1632.
The pattern books cannot be used to date the earliest time a lace pattern appeared. According to Santina Levey in Lace, A History, the pattern books contained 'tried and true' patterns because they were designed for the amateur, not the professional lace maker.