Talk:Law: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Aren't SCA "laws" better described as rules as they are not backed by a government?--[[User:User 144|User 144]] 22:26, 8 March 2007 (EST) |
Aren't SCA "laws" better described as rules as they are not backed by a government?--[[User:User 144|User 144]] 22:26, 8 March 2007 (EST) |
||
:Probably true, but they are called Laws, at least at the Kingdom level. So whether or not the name is, strictly speaking, accurate, it is in use. [[User:AlexandreDavigne|AlexandreDavigne]] 00:20, 9 March 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 00:20, 9 March 2007
In the past when I created this page, I made a separate page for law and laws. I think this distinction needs to be made a little clearer on this page. In my mind, law is the field and how the related legal system works and what ideologies etc are behind it. Laws are the rules they relate to. I know this goes against the general practice for Cunnan of not using plural nouns for page titles, but I felt they needed separate pages. - Cian Gillebhrath 11:16, 26 Apr 2006 (EST)
Aren't SCA "laws" better described as rules as they are not backed by a government?--User 144 22:26, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- Probably true, but they are called Laws, at least at the Kingdom level. So whether or not the name is, strictly speaking, accurate, it is in use. AlexandreDavigne 00:20, 9 March 2007 (EST)
