Talk:William Shakespeare: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I didn't say he wasn't period, I said that he was not medieval, which he isn't by any stretch of the imagination.--[[User:User 144|User 144]] 16:59, 23 February 2007 (EST) |
I didn't say he wasn't period, I said that he was not medieval, which he isn't by any stretch of the imagination.--[[User:User 144|User 144]] 16:59, 23 February 2007 (EST) |
||
* Actually what we really need is a category: people (post-medieval) in order to distinguish between people born after 1500 and those 20th and 21st century reenactors.--[[User:User 144|User 144]] 17:09, 23 February 2007 (EST) |
* Actually what we really need is a category: people (post-medieval) in order to distinguish between people born after 1500 and those 20th and 21st century reenactors.--[[User:User 144|User 144]] 17:09, 23 February 2007 (EST) |
||
* It really should be '''people (period)''' not medieval. But that is what we started using and until someone changes it, I treat the category as both. [[Shakespeare]] certainly can't be considered 'modern'. - [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 17:32, 23 February 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 17:32, 23 February 2007
I didn't say he wasn't period, I said that he was not medieval, which he isn't by any stretch of the imagination.--User 144 16:59, 23 February 2007 (EST)
- Actually what we really need is a category: people (post-medieval) in order to distinguish between people born after 1500 and those 20th and 21st century reenactors.--User 144 17:09, 23 February 2007 (EST)
- It really should be people (period) not medieval. But that is what we started using and until someone changes it, I treat the category as both. Shakespeare certainly can't be considered 'modern'. - Cian Gillebhrath 17:32, 23 February 2007 (EST)
