Talk:Scholasticism: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:Del|Del]] |
[[User:Del|Del]] |
||
---- |
|||
Yeah, I probably should note the Scholastic Revival. |
|||
I dont think Dante has any Scholastic credentials whatsoever ; just writing about God isnt enough to make you a Scholastic ... it's that you do so by use of formal logic, reason and argument. |
|||
Anton |
|||
Revision as of 16:13, 13 November 2003
Anton,
You forgot the neo-scholastic revival of the late 16th C: Started in 1534 by one Inigo Lopez de Loyola (you keeled my father, prepare to die). I'm sure you know the chaps.
Although you have to admit that by that stage the Universities were teaching Humanism, and the scholastics had been beaten.
Oh, and you should add the team mascot and poet laureate: Dante Alighieri (of Divina Commedia fame, as opposed to not-so-Divina Commedia dell'Arte which was definitely one of ours).
Yeah, I probably should note the Scholastic Revival.
I dont think Dante has any Scholastic credentials whatsoever ; just writing about God isnt enough to make you a Scholastic ... it's that you do so by use of formal logic, reason and argument.
Anton
