Talk:SCAism: Difference between revisions

From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Event if the steward would in many senses be a better term than the autocrat, the latter has remedial characteristics, that would encourage using it further more.
Even if the ''steward'' would in many senses be a better term than the autocrat, the latter has remedial characteristics, that would encourage using it further more.


The word autocrat communicates rather nicely the fact, that this person is ultimately in charge of the event bearing the responsibility and thus having the say in it. With the meaning of sole ruler, this particular term is the very best in communicating the mandate and responsibility.
The word autocrat communicates rather nicely the fact, that this person is ultimately in charge of the event bearing the responsibility and thus having a rather final say on how things will run in the event. With the meaning of sole ruler, this particular term is the very best in communicating the mandate and responsibility.

The question is, if this communication is really necessary, sadly I have seen that it sometimes really is.


-- Dim foreigner
-- Dim foreigner

Revision as of 19:51, 17 August 2005

Even if the steward would in many senses be a better term than the autocrat, the latter has remedial characteristics, that would encourage using it further more.

The word autocrat communicates rather nicely the fact, that this person is ultimately in charge of the event bearing the responsibility and thus having a rather final say on how things will run in the event. With the meaning of sole ruler, this particular term is the very best in communicating the mandate and responsibility.

The question is, if this communication is really necessary, sadly I have seen that it sometimes really is.

-- Dim foreigner