Talk:Norman shield: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:In the spirit of wiki's I don't see anything that needs to be deleted. I may get around to rewording a little, but it's all good information and should stay. I also intend to get around to writing something about its use in SCA combat. Most articles on Cunnan are too short anyway. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 18:54, 8 Apr 2005 (CDT) |
:In the spirit of wiki's I don't see anything that needs to be deleted. I may get around to rewording a little, but it's all good information and should stay. I also intend to get around to writing something about its use in SCA combat. Most articles on Cunnan are too short anyway. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 18:54, 8 Apr 2005 (CDT) |
||
Thanks, I think this does add in the spirit of what i was trying to say - I deleted because I had gotten too far into unfounded speculation and couldn't find a line to take it back to. |
|||
[[User:Tiff|Tiff]] 23:15, 12 Apr 2005 (CDT) |
Revision as of 15:15, 13 April 2005
Conrad :: please feel free to delete anything you want rid of. I've rather gone on a bit.
--Simoncursitor 09:05, 6 Apr 2005 (CDT)
- In the spirit of wiki's I don't see anything that needs to be deleted. I may get around to rewording a little, but it's all good information and should stay. I also intend to get around to writing something about its use in SCA combat. Most articles on Cunnan are too short anyway. Conrad Leviston 18:54, 8 Apr 2005 (CDT)
Thanks, I think this does add in the spirit of what i was trying to say - I deleted because I had gotten too far into unfounded speculation and couldn't find a line to take it back to. Tiff 23:15, 12 Apr 2005 (CDT)