Talk:Kingdom of Gleann Abhann: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
This is the only one of the 19 kingdoms that doesn't have "Kingdom of" in its name/title - that should be fixed by a superuser for parallelism. [[User:Avraham haRofeh|Avraham haRofeh]] 02:21, 5 September 2006 (EST) |
This is the only one of the 19 kingdoms that doesn't have "Kingdom of" in its name/title - that should be fixed by a superuser for parallelism. [[User:Avraham haRofeh|Avraham haRofeh]] 02:21, 5 September 2006 (EST) |
||
Good idea. I also notice many of the local groups are listed as (name) instead of Shire/Barony of (name). Maybe someone can fix those as well? |
|||
Revision as of 13:57, 25 September 2006
Technically, Gleann Abhann became a Kingdom on October 1st (per the BoD). However, Coronation was postponed until November due to the ravages of Hurricane Katrina. US 71 12:45, 10 Dec 2005 (CST)
I added an SCA box based on the info that was there already. THus most of it is now unneeded, as it appears in the box. If someone has a better use for the space, knock yourself out. I figured I'd leave it if someone really prefered that to the nifty box most kingdoms have.
Thanks for the box...I have a copy of the Kingdom Arms I can upload.
Nice kingdom graphic. I like the laurel leaves. Sabine 06:08, 28 July 2006 (EST)
- Thank you --Thorgrimr of Dragonsspine 11:44, 28 July 2006 (EST)
This is the only one of the 19 kingdoms that doesn't have "Kingdom of" in its name/title - that should be fixed by a superuser for parallelism. Avraham haRofeh 02:21, 5 September 2006 (EST)
Good idea. I also notice many of the local groups are listed as (name) instead of Shire/Barony of (name). Maybe someone can fix those as well?
