Talk:Knight: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Needed: SCA section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page needs the [[SCA]] aspect, or a link to a page on the SCA knight. I suspect that with [[Chivalry]], [[Knight]], [[Peer]], [[Order of Chivalry]], [[regalia]] etc, there is already lots of information already on [[Cunnan]] about SCA knights, but it needs to be organised better. Also, is there an [[alternate title]]s list for knights?- [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 09:48, 26 May 2006 (EST) |
This page needs the [[SCA]] aspect, or a link to a page on the SCA knight. I suspect that with [[Chivalry]], [[Knight]], [[Peer]], [[Order of Chivalry]], [[regalia]] etc, there is already lots of information already on [[Cunnan]] about SCA knights, but it needs to be organised better. Also, is there an [[alternate title]]s list for knights?- [[User:Cian|Cian Gillebhrath]] 09:48, 26 May 2006 (EST) |
||
:I agree it needs to be organised better, but it has looked like too much work for me every time I consider it. If anybody does want to do an SCA version, I would be happy to tack on the alternate titles list though. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 10:49, 26 May 2006 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 11:49, 26 May 2006
This page needs the SCA aspect, or a link to a page on the SCA knight. I suspect that with Chivalry, Knight, Peer, Order of Chivalry, regalia etc, there is already lots of information already on Cunnan about SCA knights, but it needs to be organised better. Also, is there an alternate titles list for knights?- Cian Gillebhrath 09:48, 26 May 2006 (EST)
- I agree it needs to be organised better, but it has looked like too much work for me every time I consider it. If anybody does want to do an SCA version, I would be happy to tack on the alternate titles list though. Conrad Leviston 10:49, 26 May 2006 (EST)
