User talk:Daniel C. Boyer: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hello Daniel, and welcome to Cunnan. Thanks for your contributions so far. As you can see we have made a reasonable start on the heraldry stuff, but there is still a great deal to be done to improve it. If you have any questions please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. By the way, I'll try and get back to you about my source for "gout de vin", but I don't have my major period heraldry source to hand at the moment. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 19:27, 13 Dec 2005 (CST) |
Hello Daniel, and welcome to Cunnan. Thanks for your contributions so far. As you can see we have made a reasonable start on the heraldry stuff, but there is still a great deal to be done to improve it. If you have any questions please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. By the way, I'll try and get back to you about my source for "gout de vin", but I don't have my major period heraldry source to hand at the moment. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 19:27, 13 Dec 2005 (CST) |
||
:You're welcome. The first (1611) edition of Guillim is pretty close in many ways... --[[User:Daniel C. Boyer|Daniel C. Boyer]] 14:10, 15 Dec 2005 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 07:10, 16 December 2005
Hello Daniel, and welcome to Cunnan. Thanks for your contributions so far. As you can see we have made a reasonable start on the heraldry stuff, but there is still a great deal to be done to improve it. If you have any questions please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. By the way, I'll try and get back to you about my source for "gout de vin", but I don't have my major period heraldry source to hand at the moment. Conrad Leviston 19:27, 13 Dec 2005 (CST)
- You're welcome. The first (1611) edition of Guillim is pretty close in many ways... --Daniel C. Boyer 14:10, 15 Dec 2005 (CST)
