User talk:Conrad Leviston: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
Good work on the [[Line divisions]] articles. - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] 21:30, 10 Jun 2004 (EST) |
Good work on the [[Line divisions]] articles. - [[User:Tobin|Tobin]] 21:30, 10 Jun 2004 (EST) |
||
--- |
|||
Yep, I did all that while I was at work (a quiet night on the door can be very productive). It was actually really easy to draw up the images. [[User:Conrad Leviston|Conrad Leviston]] 22:24, 10 Jun 2004 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 23:24, 10 June 2004
<evil grin> Actually I did know the dragon was the natural enemy of the elephant. For the dragon is a serpent and the serpent did offer the fruit of the tree to eve. ;-) Bet you didn't know 12th C dragons only had 2 legs though. :-)
Tiffany (just a little light bedtime reading :-) )
---
The serpent offering the fruit, huh? I suppose all those tales of dragons capturing fair maidens makes sense in that context. Especially if you're one of those nutty religious types who believes that the fruit is a metaphor for sex. The maid is captured by the rapacious and then rescued by the chaste.
I'm still not sure how the elephant comes into it though.
---
I think it's a red herring - actually a real observation of african snakes that could strangle large animals - a piece of factual information that slipped in by accident amoungst all that metaphor. I bet the early greek descriptions show dragons as just a large snake with no legs.
Tiff
Good work on the Line divisions articles. - Tobin 21:30, 10 Jun 2004 (EST)
---
Yep, I did all that while I was at work (a quiet night on the door can be very productive). It was actually really easy to draw up the images. Conrad Leviston 22:24, 10 Jun 2004 (EST)
