Full-deckism: Difference between revisions
From Cunnan
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(Anybody else want to add some?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A full-deckism is a term used to describe somebody who ''isn't all there''. It is derived from the phrase ''not playing with a full deck''. Here is [http://winn.com/bs/fulldeck.html an exhaustive list of full-deckisms] |
A full-deckism is a term used to describe somebody who ''isn't all there''. It is derived from the phrase ''not playing with a full deck''. Here is [http://winn.com/bs/fulldeck.html an exhaustive list of full-deckisms]. |
||
===SCA full-deckisms=== |
===SCA full-deckisms=== |
||
* |
* Not the sharpest sword in the armoury |
||
* |
* He has a few fighters missing in the shield wall |
||
* He's a few points short of a coronet |
|||
Revision as of 13:21, 12 November 2003
A full-deckism is a term used to describe somebody who isn't all there. It is derived from the phrase not playing with a full deck. Here is an exhaustive list of full-deckisms.
SCA full-deckisms
- Not the sharpest sword in the armoury
- He has a few fighters missing in the shield wall
- He's a few points short of a coronet
